www-russia.org

Chapter 40: The Patriarch’s Prayer

The Patriarch of Moscow and All Rus’, a man who had once blessed tanks and likened the President to an archangel, now found himself adrift in a gilded tomb. His cavernous office in the Danilov Monastery was still heavy with the scent of incense and beeswax, but the red phone that had once connected him to the heart of the Kremlin was silent. The new government was studiously, coolly polite. They did not attack him. They simply ignored him. He was a king in a museum, his moral authority shattered by his years of vocal, theological support for a lost and criminal war. Reports from across the country spoke of declining attendance, of a quiet but growing crisis of faith in an institution that had so brazenly served earthly power.

The simmering dissent finally boiled over in a closed session of the Holy Synod. A faction of younger, reform-minded bishops, men who had been ministering to the endless processions of grieving mothers and broken soldiers, made their move. They called for a vote of no confidence.

A hardline, nationalist bishop, his face purple with outrage, rose to defend the old order. “This is a betrayal!” he thundered. “Our duty is and has always been to the Holy Russian World! The war was a righteous struggle against the godless, decadent West!”

He was answered not with anger, but with a quiet, powerful sorrow. Bishop Alexei, a young, charismatic cleric from a provincial diocese, a man who had earned immense respect for his work with the war’s forgotten victims, rose to speak.

“It is not the West that has threatened our souls,” Alexei began, his voice not thundering, but resonating with a profound, aching piety. “It is the sin we have committed ourselves. The greatest of all sins. Idolatry.”

A shocked silence fell over the Synod.

“We have worshipped a false idol,” Alexei continued, his voice growing stronger. “We have worshipped the idol of the State. We have worshipped the idol of the Nation. We have rendered unto Caesar not just what is Caesar’s, but we have given him what is God’s. We blessed his missiles. We sanctified his wars. We turned the cross into a sword. In our pursuit of an earthly ‘Russian World,’ we have risked losing the Kingdom of Heaven itself.”

He looked around at the faces of the assembled bishops. “The secular government has its Truth Commission. Our Church must now begin its own, far deeper process. A process of Pokayaniye. Of penance. Of repentance.”

He called on them to formally, humbly, apologize to the Orthodox Christians of Ukraine. He called for the Church to completely withdraw from all political affairs, to once again become a hospital for the soul, not a department of the state. He called for them to pour their immense wealth not into new golden domes, but into healing the spiritual wounds of the war—the orphans, the widows, and the morally injured soldiers. “The only way to save this Church,” he concluded, his voice ringing with a terrifying, simple truth, “is to return to the radical gospel of a crucified Christ, and to abandon the gospels of power and glory.”

The speech shattered the Synod’s decorum. In the chaotic, secret vote that followed, the reformers won by a fragile, narrow margin. The old Patriarch was officially "retired" for reasons of health to a remote monastery. Bishop Alexei was elected as his interim successor, a man tasked with steering the Church through its own dark night of the soul. A quiet, spiritual revolution had begun.

The Discourse, 40: The Schism of Faith and Power

Section 40.1: The "Caesaropapist" Tradition and Its Collapse
The Russian Orthodox Church has a long history of "Caesaropapism," a relationship where the church is effectively a subordinate department of the state, providing ideological and spiritual legitimacy to the ruler in exchange for protection and privilege. The old Patriarch’s support for the war was the modern culmination of this centuries-old tradition. Bishop Alexei’s speech is not just a political attack; it is a radical theological break with this history. His accusation of "idolatry"—worshipping the state—is a direct assault on the very foundation of the Church's relationship with power, framing its recent actions not as a political mistake, but as a profound spiritual sin.

Section 40.2: Institutional "Pokayaniye" (Repentance)
Alexei's call for "Pokayaniye" (a deep, Orthodox concept of repentance and penance) represents a crucial step in a nation's moral recovery that a secular body like a Truth Commission cannot address. While the TRC can establish historical facts, a religious institution can address the spiritual and moral wounds of a nation. By proposing a formal apology and a shift in mission from serving the state to serving the wounded, the reformist faction is arguing that the Church cannot regain its moral authority until it publicly atones for its own complicity in the national catastrophe. This internal, spiritual reckoning is a powerful parallel to the state's own political reckoning.

Section 40.3: The "Depoliticization" of Faith as a Democratic Prerequisite
The reformers' ultimate goal—the complete withdrawal of the Church from politics—is a crucial and often overlooked prerequisite for a stable liberal democracy. A key feature of the old authoritarian system was the fusion of state, nation, and religion into a single, monolithic ideological bloc. This fusion makes political dissent not just an act of disloyalty, but an act of heresy. By forcing a separation of church and state, the reformers are not attacking faith; they are liberating it from its political bondage. This "depoliticization" is essential for creating a pluralistic society where political disagreement can exist without being framed as a spiritual or existential threat to the nation itself.