www-russia.org

Chapter 19: The Unseen Wound

The Potemkin Rehabilitation Sanatorium Number 7 was, like many things in Russia, a grand facade concealing a rotting core. The 19th-century classical building, with its elegant yellow portico, was where the television crews came to film stories of heroic soldiers recovering from their wounds.

Dr. Ivan Morozov worked in the real hospital, in the grim, concrete annex hidden behind the Potemkin building. There were no television crews here. Here, there was only the truth.

Morozov was a military psychiatrist, and his wards were filled with the men who had come back from the front, their bodies largely intact, but their minds shattered. Every day, he listened to the stories, a priest in a secular confession booth, absorbing the spiritual poisons that the soldiers had brought home with them.

He listened to a nineteen-year-old artilleryman from Buryatia who had developed a crippling, paralyzing stutter after his battery had flattened a residential building in Bakhmut. “We… we… we were just… shooting at… at coordinates, Doctor. Just numbers. Then I saw a video on Telegram. I saw… the little… the little red bicycle.”

He listened to a Spetsnaz sergeant, a man built like a concrete blockhouse, who wept uncontrollably because he couldn't get the smell of burnt sugar out of his nose—the lingering, sickly sweet scent from a confectionery factory his unit had used as a fire base during a firefight.

But it was the story of a contract soldier from Kostroma that broke through Morozov's professional detachment. The soldier was a quiet, middle-aged man, his face a landscape of weary resignation. He spoke in a monotone, his eyes fixed on a point on the far wall.

“They told us it was a den of terrorists,” he said. “A farmhouse. Our orders were to clear it, no survivors. We did. It was fast. Only when we were checking the bodies… did we see. They were just old people. A man and his wife. And their son. He was… he looked like my boy. Maybe sixteen. He had one of those… those stupid video games in his hand.” The soldier paused, his breathing shallow. “The commander told us to plant the weapons. Kalashnikovs, a grenade launcher. For the photos. He said it was standard procedure. He said we had done a good thing.”

The soldier looked at Morozov then, his eyes no longer empty, but filled with a terrible, pleading lucidity. “I have a son, Doctor. How can I look my boy in the eye when I get home? Tell me. How can I be his father?”

That night, Morozov went home and did something that could have him imprisoned for twenty years. He opened a secure laptop, provided to him by an old university friend who now worked for a human rights organization in Vienna. And he began to write. He transcribed the soldier's testimony verbatim. He added the story of the artilleryman and the red bicycle. The Spetsnaz sergeant and the smell of the confectionery.

He was not a political man. He was a doctor. And a doctor’s first duty is to diagnose the disease. He realized, with a clarity that was both terrifying and liberating, that he was not just treating individual soldiers for post-traumatic stress. He was documenting the symptoms of a profound national sickness. A deep, unseen wound to the country’s soul, a moral injury so vast and septic that it threatened to poison everything. He did not know if his work would ever see the light of day. But like a doctor taking notes on a new and terrifying plague, he knew he had a sacred duty to record its ravages.

The Discourse, 19: The Sociology of Moral Injury

Section 19.1: Distinguishing PTSD from Moral Injury
Dr. Morozov's work documents a condition that is often conflated with, but is critically distinct from, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). PTSD is a psychological injury resulting from experiencing or witnessing terrifying events; it is a disorder of fear. Moral Injury, however, is a wound to the soul that occurs when an individual's actions, or lack of action, violate their deeply held moral beliefs. The soldier who is haunted by having to plant weapons on a dead teenager is not suffering from fear; he is suffering from a catastrophic sense of shame and transgression. He feels that his fundamental identity as a good person, as a father, has been shattered. While PTSD can be treated by mitigating a fear response, moral injury is far more complex, requiring a path to atonement or forgiveness that is often unavailable in a state that denies the crime even happened.

Section 19.2: The State as a Vector of Moral Injury
In conventional warfare, moral injuries can occur, but are often viewed as tragic aberrations. In the context of the Russian invasion, however, the state itself is shown to be a primary vector of moral injury. The regime's official narrative—that this is a heroic fight against "Nazis" and "terrorists"—is so profoundly disconnected from the reality the soldiers experience on the ground (shooting at coordinates that turn out to be apartment buildings, executing civilians) that it creates an unendurable cognitive dissonance. The order to "plant the weapons" is the key moment; it is the state actively forcing the soldier to become a complicit participant in the lie, making him not just a killer, but a fraud. This systemic, top-down generation of moral injury is a hallmark of a totalitarian war.

Section 19.3: The Physician as Witness: The Hippocratic Oath vs. The State
Morozov's decision to document these testimonies represents a profound ethical conflict: the tension between his duty as a citizen of a repressive state and his duty as a physician. His Hippocratic Oath—"first, do no harm"—can be interpreted as extending beyond the individual patient to the health of the society itself. He comes to understand that he cannot "cure" his patients' moral injuries, because the "pathogen" is the state and its ongoing war of aggression. His act of secretly recording the truth is a medical one; he is creating a diagnostic record of the nation's spiritual sickness. It is a deeply subversive act, recasting the doctor not just as a healer, but as a moral witness whose professional ethics compel him to create an honest record of a crime when the state insists it does not exist.